Jump to Navigation

Latin America Securities Fraud Law Blog

Quorne Limited and Michael Sarkesian

Broker/Dealer and Investment Advisor Fraud, Misrepresentation and Mismanagement FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney, Russell L. Forkey, Esq.

March, 2012:

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Quorne Limited and Michael Sarkesian, 10-cv-9560 (GBD) (S.D.N.Y)

BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CORPORATION AND RESIDENT OF SWITZERLAND SETTLE CHARGES OF INSIDER TRADING IN THE OPTIONS OF INTERMUNE, INC.

The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced that, on March 29, 2012, the Honorable George B. Daniels, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York, entered a settled final judgment for insider trading in the options of InterMune, Inc. as to Michael S. Sarkesian, a Swiss citizen and resident, and Quorne Ltd., a British Virgin Islands limited liability company wholly owned by a Cyprus trust maintained for the benefit of a Sarkesian relation. The alleged illicit trading by Sarkesian and Quorne took place ahead of a December 17, 2010 announcement that the European Union's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, or CHMP, had recommended to the European Commission that it permit InterMune to market its developmental drug, Esbriet, in the European Union. Sarkesian and Quorne consented to the entry of the final judgment, which imposes injunctive and monetary relief. The Commission also announced that on March 27, 2012, it amended its complaint, filed on December 23, 2010 against one or more unknown purchasers of the options of InterMune, to name Sarkesian and Quorne as defendants.

In its amended complaint, the Commission alleges that Sarkesian was tipped to material non-public information concerning the CHMP's recommendation in advance of the December 17 announcement and that, while in possession of this material non-public information, Sarkesian exercised his authority to manage and administer Quorne's funds by recommending to Quorne that it purchase InterMune call options. As a result, Sarkesian caused Quorne to purchase 400 InterMune call options through a brokerage account in Switzerland on December 7 and 8, 2010. The market price of the 400 options rose over 500% following the December 17 announcement.

On December 23, 2010, on the same day that the Commission filed its initial complaint, the Court entered a Temporary Restraining Order freezing assets and trading proceeds from the alleged illicit trading and prohibiting the then-unknown purchasers from disposing of the options or any proceeds from the sale of the options. Quorne later sold the 400 options, the proceeds of which have remained frozen by Court order.

Without admitting or denying the allegations of the amended complaint, Quorne and Sarkesian consented to entry of a final judgment enjoining them from future violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and ordering them jointly and severally to pay $616,000 in disgorgement and $93,806.17 in civil penalties pursuant to Exchange Act Section 21A. The monetary sanctions will be paid out of the frozen funds. See Litigation Release No. 21794 (December 23, 2010).

Marleen Jantzen and John Jantzen

Account Executive and Registered Representative Fraud, Mismanagement and Misrepresentation FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Lawyer, Russell L. Forkey, Esq.

March, 2012:

SEC v. Marleen Jantzen and John Jantzen, 1:10-cv-00740-JRN (W.D. Tex. [Austin Div.])

COURT ENTERS SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST INSIDER TRADING DEFENDANTS JOHN JANTZEN AND WIFE, MARLEEN JANTZEN

Recently, United States District Judge James R. Nowlin of the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, entered summary judgment against Austin residents Marleen Jantzen, a former assistant to an executive at Dell, Inc., and husband John Jantzen, a Commission-registered securities broker. The Commission previously charged the Jantzens with insider trading in connection with a September 21, 2009 public announcement that Dell would acquire Perot Systems, Corp. in a tender offer transaction.

The Court found that both Jantzens insider traded in violation of Sections 10(b) and 14(e) of the Exchange Act, and Rules 10b-5 and 14e-3(a) thereunder, and that Marleen Jantzen also violated Exchange Act Rule 14e-3(d). The Court enjoined the Jantzens from future violations of those provisions and ordered them to pay disgorgement of $26,920.50, representing profits gained as a result of the illegal insider trading, plus prejudgment interest. The Court deferred a final ruling on the Commission's request for monetary penalties, pending submission of further briefing by the parties.

In granting this relief, the Court specifically found that "Marleen tipped John and took unprecedented and persistent action to ensure that they were able to maximize their informational advantage." The Court also found that the evidence showed "a high degree of scienter, particularly with regard to John, who as a licensed securities broker certainly knew what he was doing."

The Commission's complaint, filed on October 5, 2010, alleged that Marleen Jantzen learned through an internal Dell email material, nonpublic information regarding Dell's impending tender offer for the shares of Perot Systems, Inc., and thereafter tipped her husband to the inside information. The Court found that on September 18, 2009, the last trading day before the tender offer announcement, Marleen Jantzen made a highly unusual cash transfer to the couples' joint brokerage account. Within minutes of this transfer, John Jantzen bought Perot Systems call options and stock and Dell securities in the joint account-in total, purchasing 500 shares of Perot Systems common stock and 24 Perot Systems call option contracts.

On September 21, 2009, Dell and Perot Systems jointly announced the tender offer for Perot Systems' shares. The stock price immediately rose from $17.91 to $29.56, or approximately 65% from the prior day's closing price. When John Jantzen cashed out that day, the couple reaped one-day trading profits of $26,920.50.

Seniors Beware: What you Should Know About Life Settlements

Lately, more and more seniors are hearing about opportunities to sell their existing life insurance for cash in transactions known as life settlements. A life settlement, or senior settlement, as they are sometimes called, involves selling an existing life insurance policy to a third party-a person or an entity other than the company that issued the policy-for more than the policy's cash surrender value, but less than the net death benefit.

Life settlements can be a valuable source of liquidity for people who would otherwise surrender their policies or allow them to lapse-or for people whose life insurance needs have changed. But they are not for everyone. Life settlements can have high transaction costs and unintended consequences. And even if you decide a life settlement is generally right for you, it can be hard to tell whether you are getting a fair price.

If you are considering selling your life insurance policy to a third party, you can help protect yourself by familiarizing yourself with your existing policy so that you fully understand your options, becoming fully informed about life settlements, shopping around for the best offer, and dealing only with licensed buyers and brokers. We are issuing this Alert to highlight the questions you should ask and the factors to consider before entering into a life settlement.

What Is a Life Settlement?

Until fairly recently, if you owned a life insurance policy that you no longer wanted or needed, you had two choices: surrender the policy for its cash value or allow it to lapse. Now, there is a third option: selling your policy (or the right to receive the death benefit) to an entity other than the insurance company that issued the policy in a transaction known as a life settlement.

The life settlement market emerged as an offshoot of the viatical settlement industry that developed in the 1980s as a source of liquidity for AIDS patients and other terminally ill policyholders with life expectancies of less than two years. Unlike viaticals, however, life settlements involve policyholders who are not terminally ill, but generally have a life expectancy of between two and ten years. Life settlements also tend to involve policies with higher net death benefits than viaticals.

The life settlement market has continued to expand rapidly in recent years. One recent report estimates that existing policies with a collective face value of $11.8 billion were sold by policyholders to investors in 2008.

How Do Life Settlements Work?

The purchasers of life settlements, sometimes called life settlement companies or life settlement providers, generally are institutions that either hold the policies to maturity and collect the net death benefits or resell policies-or sell interests in multiple, bundled policies-to hedge funds or other investors. In exchange, you receive a lump sum payment. The amount you will receive in the secondary market depends on a range of factors, including your age, health and the terms and conditions of your policy-but it is generally more than the policy's cash surrender value and less than the net death benefit.

When you sell your life insurance policy, whoever buys it is acquiring a financial interest in your death. In addition to paying you a lump sum for your policy, the buyer agrees to pay any additional premiums that might be required to support the cost of the policy for as long as you live. In exchange, the buyer will receive the death benefit when you die.

Factors to Consider When Deciding to Sell Your Life Insurance Policy

Life settlements have proven profitable not only for institutional investors that purchase policies, but also for the providers and brokers who handle these transactions. As a result, competition among life settlements providers for individuals seeking to sell or otherwise terminate their life insurance policies has become increasingly intense. Because the life settlement industry is relatively new and may target seniors who may be in poor health, it can be prone to aggressive sales tactics and abuse.

That does not mean that you should never consider a life settlement. A life settlement might make sense for you if you no longer want or need your current policy-or if you can no longer afford the expense of paying insurance premiums and are willing to give up or replace the coverage. Even then, however, you should proceed with caution. Here are some of the key factors you should consider:

  • Ongoing Life Insurance Needs-If you are considering buying a new policy with the proceeds of the life settlement, you will need to determine whether you will be able to get a new policy with equivalent coverage-and at what cost. Your old policy will still be in force and may affect your ability to get additional coverage. Even if you can get a new policy, you may have to pay higher premiums because of your age or changes in your health status. If your goal is to retain coverage but lower the premiums you pay or otherwise obtain different features, you might want to consider options such as reducing your existing amount of policy coverage or making a "1035 Exchange."

1035 Exchanges

If you're thinking of switching from one life insurance policy to another, you should consider whether a "1035 Exchange" would be more beneficial than a life settlement. Depending on your circumstances, if you opt for a life settlement, you may have to pay taxes if the cash surrender value of your policy-or the amount of a life settlement-exceeds the premiums you've paid.

The Internal Revenue Service allows you to exchange an insurance policy that you own for a new life insurance policy insuring the same person without paying tax on the investment gains earned on your original contract-which could be a substantial benefit. Because this is governed by Section 1035 of the Internal Revenue Code, these are called "1035 Exchanges." But there are other factors you should consider when deciding whether to exchange your policy, including potential loss of death benefits.

  • Less Costly Alternatives-If one of the factors driving your decision is a need for cash, be aware that surrendering your life insurance policy for its cash value or pursuing a life settlement are not your only options-especially if you would ideally like to retain your coverage. For example, you might want to see whether you can borrow against your policy. You might also be eligible for accelerated death benefits, which allow an individual with a long-term, catastrophic, or terminal illness to receive benefits on his or her policy prior to dying. Check with the company that issued your policy before leaping into a life settlement. You may still decide that a life settlement is the best alternative for you, but you should be aware of all of your options before making up your mind.
  • Difficulty Determining Fair Prices-One of the hardest things to know when you are selling a life insurance policy is whether you are getting a fair price for your policy. There is no transparent secondary market for life insurance policies. The best way to make sure you are getting a fair price is to shop around. This can mean directly contacting multiple life settlement companies, using a licensed life settlement broker who will shop your policy around on your behalf, or contacting your broker or other financial services provider.
  • Impact on Your Finances-A cash payment from a life settlement can have unintended financial consequences, especially if your financial circumstances have changed from when you first bought the policy. For example, if you currently receive state or federal public assistance, such as Medicaid, a life settlement can negatively impact your ability to participate in that program. Before you proceed with a life settlement, be sure you fully understand the financial implications for you and your family. You may want to consult your attorney, accountant, or other legal or financial professional.
  • Impact on Your Survivors-Consider carefully your need for current income against the future financial needs of your survivors. Even if you have determined that they do not need the proceeds from your insurance policy at this time, ask whether there could be a chance that this situation could change. If so, ask yourself whether you can obtain the liquidity you seek from other sources or by trying alternative ways to tap into the insurance proceeds as suggested above.

How Can I Protect Myself?

If you decide to go forward with a life settlement, here are some questions you should be sure to ask.

  1. Is the life settlement broker or provider licensed in my state? A growing number of states regulate life settlement companies and life settlement brokers to some degree, and may require that they be licensed. Be sure to ask your state insurance commissioner whether the life settlement company or broker you are dealing with is properly licensed-and whether either has a record of complaints. If you are working with a securities broker, FINRA BrokerCheck should be your first resource to learn about his or her professional background, registration/license status and disciplinary history.
  2. What will happen to my policy? Ask what the life settlement company that is buying your policy will do with it. Will they hold it themselves? Sell it individually? Or package it with other policies and sell interests in the package to other investors? The ultimate buyer of your policy will become responsible for paying the premiums and will collect the death benefit when you die-and, as noted below, any interim and ultimate buyers of your policy will also have access to a great deal of personal information about you, including your health status.

     
  3. What information will I have to provide? To whom? For how long? When you sell your life insurance policy, you will have to sign a release authorizing the release of medical and other personal information so that the buyer can determine how much to offer for your policy. You may also have to agree to provide periodic updates about your health. Once the buyer obtains that information, it may be shared with other parties, including lenders or third party investors.
  4. How can I protect my privacy? Before accepting any offer from a life settlement company, you should carefully read the application, and make sure that the company has procedures in place to protect the confidentiality of your information. If it will be sold, ask to whom, and whether the end buyers will have access to your personal information. If you use a life settlement broker, find out the names of the life settlement companies from whom the broker solicits bids, and ask about the privacy policies of all parties or potential parties to the transaction. In many cases, state regulations govern the handling of confidential information. Contact your state insurance commissioner to find out what regulations apply.
  5. What's the best price I can get for my policy? If you are using a life settlement broker, ask what bids were received, and what steps the broker used to make sure you are being offered the most competitive price available. If you are approached by someone soliciting you to sell your life insurance policy, make sure you understand that person's role in the transaction: is he or she a life settlement broker who represents you, or is the person affiliated with a particular life settlement company? If the answer is the latter, the person may only obtain an offer from that company, making it hard for you to know whether you are being offered a competitive price for your policy.
  6. What are the transaction costs? Life settlements can have high transaction costs. The commissions paid by life settlement companies to life settlement brokers and other financial professionals involved in the transaction can be as high as 30%. Ask your broker or other financial adviser what they are being compensated for their role in the transaction and how their compensation is being calculated. Also inquire about what other parties are receiving commissions. If someone recommends a particular life settlement to you, find out what they are being paid, and by whom.
  7. What are the tax consequences? The lump sum payment you receive in exchange for your life insurance policy can be taxable, depending on your circumstances. Before entering into a life settlement, check with a tax professional about the tax implications of any transaction you are considering.
  8. What if I change my mind? Always remember that you do not have to accept an offer to purchase your life insurance policy, even if you shopped around for the best price. If you do accept an offer and later reconsider, be aware that some states have laws that allow you to change your mind within a certain amount of time.
  9. Is the life settlement in my interest or my investment professional's? At least one marketing brochure targeted at investment professionals not only touts the potential commissions from life settlements, but also emphasizes that additional revenues can be generated from the seller's purchase of other investment products using the proceeds from the life settlement. Citing industry statistics, the brochure notes that almost half of all life settlement transactions result in the purchase of new life insurance. In other words, your investment professional stands to make two commissions off of a life settlement transaction. And you may end up replacing a perfectly good policy with a costly new one.
  10. Am I being pressured to make a fast decision? If you feel that you are being subjected to high-pressure sales tactics, and other aggressive advertising, marketing and sales efforts, beware. A legitimate investment professional will provide clear answers to your questions and will give you the time you need to make an informed decision.

Reminders

Life settlements may make sense for people who no longer need or want their insurance policies, and would otherwise surrender their policies or allow them to lapse. But even then, you should proceed with caution. Consult with your broker or other financial services provider, and make sure that you:

  • are dealing with properly licensed entities;
  • are aware of the confidentiality policies of the parties involved;
  • are getting a fair price; and
  • understand the tax and other implications of the transaction.

Where to Turn for Help and Additional Resources

Life settlements can involve almost any kind of insurance policy, including variable policies. If you believe that you have been damaged as a result of the sale, purchase or exchange of a life settlement, contact us.

Contact Us

With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.

Preventing Scams on Seniors Act

A recently introduced House bill would require certain financial institutions to help prevent fraud against senior citizens. Called the Preventing Affinity Scams on Seniors Act, HR 6305 targets so-called such schemes, in which a person trusted by an older American uses the relationship to defraud the individual. Under the bill, insured banks, thrifts and credit unions would be required to offer their senior citizen clients a service that would halt and investigate suspicious transactions and to report identified affinity scams to law enforcement.

What Are the Federal Securities Laws?

In the chaotic securities markets of the 1920's, companies often sold stocks and bonds on the basis of glittering promises of fantastic profits - without disclosing any meaningful information to investors. These conditions contributed to the disastrous Stock Market Crash of 1929. In response, the U.S. Congress enacted the federal securities laws and created the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to administer them.

There are two primary sets of federal laws that come into play when a company wants to offer and sell its securities. They are: the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act), and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

Securities Act: The Securities Act generally requires companies to give investors "full disclosure" of all "material facts," the facts investors would find important in making an investment decision. This Act also requires companies to file a registration statement with the SEC that includes information for investors. The SEC does not evaluate the merits of offerings, or determine if the securities are "good" investments.

Exchange Act: The Exchange Act requires publicly held companies to disclose information continually about their business operations, financial conditions, and managements. These companies, and in many cases their officers, directors and significant shareholders, must file periodic reports or other disclosure documents to the SEC. In some cases, the company must deliver the information directly to investors.

Russell L. Forkey2888 East Oakland Park Blvd.Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33306

Most people will be surprised as to what constitutes a security

What initially comes to most people's minds when the word security is mentioned is "stock". Yet, from a legal standpoint, the word security has a much more expansive meaning. For example, in the State of Florida the word "security" is defined in Florida Statute 517.021(21). The word "security" includes a note, stock, treasury stock, a bond, a debenture, an evidence of indebtedness, a certificate of deposit, a certificate of deposit for a security, a certificate of interest or participation, a whiskey warehouse receipt or other commodity warehouse receipt, a certificate of interest in a profit-sharing agreement or the right to participate therein, a certificate of interest in an oil, gas, petroleum, mineral, or mining title or lease or the right to participate therein, a collateral trust certificate, a reorganization certificate, a preorganization subscription, any transferable share, an investment contract, a beneficial interest in title to property, profits, or earnings, an interest in or under a profit-sharing or participation agreement or scheme, any option contract which entitles the holder to purchase or sell a given amount of the underlying security at a fixed price within a specified period of time, any other instrument commonly known as a security, including an interim or temporary bond, debenture, note, or certificate, and receipt for a security, or for subscription to a security, or any right to subscribe to or purchase any security or a viatical settlement investment. Wow!

However, as with most things in life, the fact that something is specifically identified in Florida Statute 517.021(21) as a security does not mean that courts will automatically determine that a security is involved. Courts have held that the application of chapter 517 does not turn on the name by which a particular transaction is designated, but rather on the economic realities of the commercial enterprise in question. It is for this reason that consultation with an experienced securities or commodities lawyer is of critical importance.

While we have focused on the definition of security as contained in the Florida Statute 517.021(21) each state has its own "blue sky" laws, which need to be reviewed for actions brought in a specific state. Additionally, various provisions of the U.S. Code also define what a security is under Federal law.

Therefore, bringing a securities claim against a broker/dealer or its registered representatives is fairly easy for all it takes is the filing of a submission agreement and statement of claim with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. However, where does an investor file his claim, if he invests in a private company or limited partnership independently of a broker/dealer? Who does the investor name as a party in the action? Where is the claim filed and what statute of limitations apply? These are questions that should be answered only by an experienced securities attorney.

Just by way of example, consider the following scenario. Four individuals create a company to take advantage of their experience in used car sales and financing. Each individual owns 25% of the stock in the company. Because the company is successful, the four owners what to bring in a financing company as a fifth stockholder. In order to do so, each of the four original stockholders must sell a percentage of their stock to the financing company. Among other potential claims contained within the purchase and sale agreement, this would constitute the sale of a security and be subject to the provisions of Florida Statute 517.

Another common example it that a client is dealing with a broker/dealer and its registered representative. The registered representative solicits his client to investment in an outside company which has not been disclosed to his broker/dealer. This is commonly called "selling away". In exchange for the client's investment, he or she receives shares of stock in the outside company. In this situation, the investor has two options, which are not mutually exclusive. He or she can institute an arbitration claim against the broker/dealer and its registered representative for the selling away activity and/or he or she can file a law suit against the outside company. When this type of factual pattern is presented, it is incumbent upon the client to consult with counsel so that the client can make an informed decision on where, how and when to proceed.

If you have any questions as to whether or not you have invested in what would be classified as a security, call the law office of Russell L. Forkey, P.A. to discuss the same at your initial free consultation.

Subscribe to This Blog's Feed Visit Our Securities Law Website

Contact Us Today

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Russell L. Forkey, P.A. | 2888 East Oakland Park Boulevard | Fort Lauderdale, FL 33306 | Map and Directions | Phone: 954-514-9605 | Toll Free: 888-671-0962 | Fax: 954-568-4180 | Contact Us

Privacy Policy | Legal Marketing by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.